Loading model…
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite11/27 v1 — Nutrition · score 72.7% · pass rate 73.2% (273/373) · 6/7 v2 — Resilience · score 64.2% · pass rate 43.8% (201/459)0.82s + output speed 666 tok/s$0.27, prompt tokens 45514, completion tokens 177161$0.27 across 832 tests with fast TTFT (0.82s) and high output speed (666 tok/s).coding (83.3% pass rate, 50/60) and cost categories (96.7% pass rate, 29/30).6/7) despite lower absolute score.security pass rate (45%, 54/120) and refactoring (33.3%, 40/120) indicate reliability gaps.reasoning underperforms (46.7% pass rate, 57/122), dragging overall scores.43.8%) is notably low, suggesting fragility under stress tests.Overall score % from merged run_models rows (chronological). Only runs that include this model appear as points.
Overall score % from the most recent run per selected suite version for this model. Different suites use different fixtures and max scores — only interpret comparisons qualitatively.
No score samples for the selected versions.
Score % vs pass rate % per category. With 0/1 scorers, both usually line up; with proportional tests, score % reflects partial credit while pass rate counts tests that clear the fixture threshold.
Total estimated spend per scope for this model (bars, left axis) and mean spend per merged result row (line, right axis: total ÷ tests).
Pass rate % per difficulty level — complements the score % view above.
Normalized 0–100 within this model: TTFT (shorter → higher spoke) and decode tok/s (higher → higher spoke). Values come from streamed BLXBench runs merged into overall_ranking.json.
Pass rate % per category for this model (distinct from score %, which reflects partial credit).