Loading model…
inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t:free15/17 in v2 — Resilience, score 65.3%, pass rate 44.7% (199/445)1.16s + output speed 106 tok/s$0.00, prompt tokens 36240, completion tokens 34598528/29 cost tests passed (96.6%), with zero cost across all runs.46/59 speed tests passed (78.0%), with consistent output speed.51/57 coding tests passed (89.5%), showing reliable code generation.44.7%) in Resilience suite, ranking 15/17.10/59 security tests passed (16.9%), indicating significant gaps.3/59 refactoring tests passed (5.1%), suggesting limited code restructuring ability.openai/gpt-5.5 (77.9%, 61.9%), openai/gpt-5.3-codex (77.7%, 61.2%), moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 (74.8%, 60.6%).`inclusionai/
Overall score % from merged run_models rows (chronological). Only runs that include this model appear as points.
Score % vs pass rate % per category. With 0/1 scorers, both usually line up; with proportional tests, score % reflects partial credit while pass rate counts tests that clear the fixture threshold.
Total estimated spend per scope for this model (bars, left axis) and mean spend per merged result row (line, right axis: total ÷ tests).
Pass rate % per difficulty level — complements the score % view above.
Normalized 0–100 within this model: TTFT (shorter → higher spoke) and decode tok/s (higher → higher spoke). Values come from streamed BLXBench runs merged into overall_ranking.json.
Pass rate % per category for this model (distinct from score %, which reflects partial credit).